After its celebrated reopening on November 20th, 2004,
following a renovation project that cost $858 million,
the Museum of Modern Art will begin charging visitors
$20 for admission. The cost represents a 60% increase
from the previous fee of $12 and makes MoMA one of the
most expensive urban museums in the world.
A museum is only a custodian of our collective cultural
inheritance, and has a responsibility to make its holdings
available to people from all walks of life. The $858
million dollars that MoMA has spent in its renovation
serves only its own vainglory. That
sum could have provided the old MoMA’s 1.8 million
annual visitors with free admission for forty years.
Instead, the museum will jealously hoard its collection,
allowing only the wealthiest elites access to our collective
cultural treasures.
The
$20 museum admissions fee reflects a larger cultural
trend whereby institutions deny any social responsibility
or progressive ideals in favor of the ruthless pursuit
of the bottom line. According to MoMA director Glenn
Lowry, two business models that were considered were
the pay-per-ride model of Disneyland and the peak rate
model followed by the major airlines. Sadly, both these
strategies appear progressive when compared to the luxury-goods
strategy it finally chose.
New Yorkers of middle-class means, families, artists,
even students will no longer be able to afford to spend
a Saturday afternoon with Van Gogh’s Starry
Night or Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon.
MoMA is effectively removing itself from the thriving
cultural life of the city. Only the most cursory consideration
was given to notions of social responsibility. A meagre
four free hours on Friday nights made possible by Target’s
corporate sponsorship is only pro forma.
The
divide between rich and poor is the source of our society’s
problems both at home and abroad. This divide exists
not just as an economic injustice, but also as an inequality
in what has been termed “cultural capital,”
that is, access to culture that can potentially lead
to material improvement. As this divide increases, instead
of using the power of its collection to address the
issue, MoMA seeks only to profit from the perpetuation
of inequality. MoMA has
lost sight of its mission.
If
MoMA’s greedy gambit succeeds, it will set a dangerous
precedent for our society in general. While mass media
entertainment is increasingly doled out by a handful
of powerful corporations, the cultural treasures owned
by wealthy museums will be walled off from people who
need access. Great works of art can be bought and sold,
but they belong to everyone.
|